« Batman Begins | Main | Kiehls gets even more of my money »

July 11, 2005

 Mysterious Skin  

As the most mainsteam and accessible Greg Araki movie to date, Mysterious Skin is still incredibly inaccessible and obtuse -- firmly rooted as a gay genre film, with little hope of mass appeal.

The direction and acting were absolutely incredible - and honestly fostered a caliber that was quite surprising coming from Araki. If one examines it as a genre film, the main flaw is the fetishing of Joseph Gordon-Levitt's character, which really detracts focust from the storyline. The other flaw existed in the moments of comic relief - odd lines about food and bears on sweaters - that I didn't think was that funny, but drew loud bursts of laughter from the bulk of theater goers in Chelsea.

In terms of mass appeal, its hard to make a movie that people will want to see, about two teenagers growing up and coming to terms with having been molested by a pedophile when they were 8. If any of the more uncomfortable elements were taken away, the film would be less serious/pertinent and more of an ABC/Hallmark channel movie.

It's a fine line, and I would imagine frustrating for the director -- make the movie that you want, or sacrifice it to make a movie that people will see.

Having seen many of Araki's previous efforts, I used to think that the similarities and common elements shared between them all existed because he was 'unoriginal' -- he kept on making the same movie, kept on harping on the same ideas, kept on putting a different take on the same story.

After Mysterious Skin, I think that Araki had been trying to make this movie all along -- the gratuitous violence, desensitized sex, gay themes and alien abductions are presented in a way that explains their interconnectedness. I don't know where they come from exactly, the gay experience or surviving pedophila, and perhaps -- if I could identify with either -- I might have understood the interconnectedness in a previous film, but Araki really elucidates that experience and mindset to the viewer with his latest film, as painful and disconcerting as it is.

I saw it with a filmmaker, who pondered afterwards whether or not a movie like this, or a director like Araki, could break free of the genre and make an accessible movie that isn't mired by their own experience or goals.

3/3

Posted by Jonathan at July 11, 2005 11:17 AM

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?